Skip to main content

How we've assessed the options

Since 2017/18, we have changed our assessment priorities to consider our new City for All strategy, updated building regulations and the changing socio-economic context.

In 2019, Westminster City Council declared a climate emergency and, acknowledging that we need to act fast to protect our environment, all our projects must put sustainability at their heart. Our assessment therefore now includes how each option contributes to our aim to become a carbon-neutral borough by 2040.

Our assessment priorities

Environment friendly icon

Quality homes that meet modern standards

Community icon

Opportunity and employment

Environment icon

Environmental sustainability

House owner icon

Preserve and enhance the local community

Money icon

Financial viability 

Image
Huguenot House example of living space.jpg

We want to deliver high quality new homes

Does the option deliver more good quality, well designed and safe housing that meets modern standards?

Image
Two young women sitting next to each other and looking at a laptop screen.jpg

We want to ensure the community will benefit from new jobs and investment

Does the option provide new employment opportunities in the local area in the short and long term?

Image
Sketch of aerial view of Balmoral Castle and Darwin House redevelopment

Huguenot House should contribute to the council’s goal of becoming a carbon neutral city by 2040

Does the option achieve high environmental standards, increasing energy efficiency and contributing to the council’s target to make Westminster a carbon neutral city by 2040?

Image
Two women dancing at zumba class.jpg

We want to help make residents’ lives better

Does the option benefit the existing community?

Will it allow residents to continue to enjoy their local area for years to come?

Does the option also allow room for the local community to grow?

Image
Image of a calculator and a pen

The option should be deliverable

Does the option achieve value-for-money?

Will it be viable to deliver and maintain?

Is it a good investment of public money?